You must give someone a copy of the footage if it contains their data, unless an exemption applies. If they agree, you can arrange for them to view the footage, rather than receiving a copy. You can redact a paper document using a redacting marker or a marker similar to Sharpie that has a feature of a good redacting marker.

What should we do if some of the data we’re looking to provide when responding to a right of access request contains someone else’s personal data? The ink also dries immediately. It means you do not need to wait for several minutes, you can add another layer easily if you like to completely cover the information. Sometimes, I need a second layer or more to cover the texts fully. For example, Rebecca owns a golf club. She’s received a subject access request from Sian, one of her employees. Sian, who has worked at Rebecca’s golf club for 15 years and is also an active member of the club, has asked for a copy of all her personal data. Rebecca holds a lot of information relating to Sian. Without delay, Rebecca asks Sian if she requires something in particular or if she wants everything. Sian’s reply is that she’s only interested in information about her last performance appraisal. This means the amount of information Rebecca needs to send is significantly reduced. The right to object only applies if you’re relying on the lawful bases of ‘public task’ or ‘legitimate interest’. But you may also need to take action if someone objects to you using their data when you’re relying on the lawful basis of ‘consent’. For example, if a customer has previously given you their consent to use their personal data but has now changed their mind, they might tell you they object to you continuing to use their personal data. If this happens, you’ll have to stop – but not because of their right to object. You’ll have to stop because they’re withdrawing their consent, which means that you won’t be able to rely on ‘consent’ as your lawful basis any longer, and therefore can’t continue using their data.For example, Jocelyn runs a hair salon. Naimh, a dissatisfied client, made a subject access request for all her information, including details of all colours and treatments she received since the salon opened. Jocelyn provided this information to Naimh. However, Naimh has since made several more requests for her information, despite Jocelyn telling her she doesn’t hold any additional information. Naimh stopped visiting the salon but continued making requests. In these circumstances, Jocelyn could consider Naimh’s continued requests manifestly unreasonable, made only for the purposes of disrupting Jocelyn’s business. Do we need to provide everything that includes a person’s name when responding to a right of access request? I also notice that it passes out a decent amount of ink. On the other hand, it can get a little bit dry.

Also, it has a wide coverage, which is paint-like. With one swipe, you can entirely cover your text. This means that if you process children’s information, they have a right to ask for copies of it. If the young person is under 12 and making their own request, you might need to satisfy yourself that they understand what they’re doing, but this shouldn’t be a barrier to supplying them with their information. I also think that this redacting marker can work with one swipe only. But, to make it cover the text completely you can have a couple or more swipes. If they request all their personal data, rather than information from a particular category or date range, you should gather all of that information as best you can.Do you have a difficult time using the redacting pen? If yes, you may look for another quality marker. The marker that is easy to use is that when you swipe it the ink flows smoothly. The ink must dispense properly. Redacting markers may leak if not in a good position. To prevent this from happening, you may put your redacting pens in an upright position. In this manner, the ink will not spill or leak.