Kodak 6031330 Professional Ektar 100/36 Colour Negative Film

£9.625
FREE Shipping

Kodak 6031330 Professional Ektar 100/36 Colour Negative Film

Kodak 6031330 Professional Ektar 100/36 Colour Negative Film

RRP: £19.25
Price: £9.625
£9.625 FREE Shipping

In stock

We accept the following payment methods

Description

The orange flowers are a good example of Ektar’s colour rendition. Especially when you consider I was losing daylight by the time I shot that, hence why I was looking for something to shoot with a wider aperture. For starters, the low film speed and fine grain lead to incredibly sharp images. Plus, the film speed isn’t usually of a problem since a tripod is regularly used in landscape photography. Across the board, lower film speed = lower cost. But in the past, even If you were comparing Ektar vs Portra, it was still cheaper to buy Ektar than the 160 ISO version of Portra. What other options are there that are better than Portra 160 for portraits and editorial? Perhaps Portra 400? Especially if you’re used to shooting a “consumer-grade” film (like Kodak Ultramax 400 or Kodak Gold 200), the difference will be noticeable. No matter what type of film, lower speed = less grain, so it makes sense that this version of Ektar film was only released in ISO 100.

We love it for what it is, but the unique characteristics that make Ektar standout are also what make it tough to use in a lot of circumstances. This is emphasized by the fact that most color-negative films on the market are incredibly versatile and easy to use in a variety of situations. Images made on Eastman Double X tend to have a gritty, stark overall tone. Under controlled lighting and with precise exposure and filter usage this film can exhibit the smooth, beautiful midtones it was formulated for, but in high contrast situations this film easily takes shadows and highlights right to the edge, crushing shadows and blowing highlights left and right. It’s not a film for every situation, but rewards discretion and meticulous shooting with contrasty, beautiful images. While Portra 160 is very obviously suited to portraiture, it also shines with general photography. While films like Ultramax, Gold, and Ektar will saturate the hell out of any color present in the frame, Portra 160 instead goes for depth and subtlety. This is perfect for images which emphasize texture and detail rather than bold color and contrast. Portra 160 has become a favorite of wedding photographers, portrait photographers, and photographers who generally prefer a gentler, even dreamier image. If you are confident in your scanner software and your post-production skills, this film should give you no trouble. That’s a small price to pay though and completely immaterial if you’re shooting still life, architecture, or landscape.

Alternatives to Kodak Ektar 100

EDUCATION: Chris graduated Magna Cum Laude from Adelphi University with a degree in Communications in Journalism in 2009. Since then, he's learned and adapted to various things in the fields of social media, SEO, app development, e-commerce development, HTML, etc. Although Ektar 100 is a recently released film from Kodak, only slightly older than the latest Portra films, it has long a heritage. The name Ektar has been used by Kodak on various products for the last century. Starting in the 1930s and going through the 1960s Ektar was a name applied to a range of pro lenses for the 2"x3" format. My first exposure to the name was with the 2x3 Graflex I used for a few years which had a Kodak Ektar 107mm f/3.7 lens. Later Kodak reimagined the name for a range of color negative films introduced in the late 1980s in several flavors including 25, 125, and 1000 speeds. All promising fine grain and vivid color rendition. Kodak produced those films for about a decade but have long been discontinued.

Portra 400’s versatility makes it the Kodak film that I’d recommend for every situation. Its wide exposure latitude makes it suitable for the brightest daylight scenes and the darkest low-light scenes, as well as in super high contrast situation. The wide exposure latitude also provides a lot of room for over- and under-exposure, making it a particularly good film for cameras with slow shutter speeds or slow lenses. A wonderful holiday film - any trip where you're expecting lovely sunshine (beaches or mountains!) deserves a roll of Kodak Ektar But you can definitely get some beautiful shots with Ektar 100 at night time and you won’t get too much grain in the deep shadows. Sample Shots Of Kodak Ektar 100 Final Word Where Portra 800 tends to disappoint is when it’s under-exposed. Under-exposed images take on the dreaded green shadows so familiar to color negative shooters. That said, experienced low-light shooters will have a ball with this film. Buy it here in 35mm, here in medium format.

Why I Don’t Think Kodak Ektar 100 is Worth It

Kodak Ektar is a film that is a low ISO value of ISO 100. For this reason, it’s popular with many landscape photographers and in the 120 format you’re surely going to shoot it with a camera placed on a tripod. This is one of the few films that I’ve shot which gives me consistent results that I’ve pretty much expected. In a few situations though, it was unexpected–like when shooting it when it’s 10 years expired. While it may share a name with the Kodak Ektar of the 1980s and ‘90s, the “new” version of the film is an entirely different product. Only offered in 100 speed, the 2008 release included Kodak Ektar 35mm and 120 formats. 4×5 and 8×10 large formats were introduced two years later. There isn’t much difference between these two when it comes to exposure latitude, they’re both brilliant and have top-tier dynamic range. Skin Tones You can shoot any out-of-date film but there are quite a lot of things that come into play when you do that. Our full review of Kodak’s newest film, Ektachrome E100, can be seen here. Here are some snippets from that piece.

For this recipe, literally a film camera loaded with Ektar and a Fujifilm X camera were placed side-by-side and captured the same subject at the same moment. Myself and Thomas Schwab worked really hard on this one, trying absolutely everything in our quest to get it as close to “right” as possible. It’s amazing how close we came! But, we also recognized that it’s not perfect. It’s not vibrant enough as +6 Color is really necessary, but isn’t an option, unfortunately. I would love to get closer to the film, but I just don’t think it’s possible–this is as accurate as one can get on Fujifilm X JPEGs. I love using Ektar too, great fine color film, but I usually don’t get such saturated results, the color balance is generally very good and subtle on all tones. But it depends of course of your processing and scanning method. About scanning, why do you keep all this dirt on your photos, it’s not part of the photo itself (I can imagine that you don’t put deliberately dirt on your lens…) but comes mainly from the scanning process. Of course, it’s not easy to get rid of all the small dust and particles involved in scanning, but come on, it’s not impossible to remove a great part of it and clean the photo (SRDx plugin from Silverfast for Lightroom and Photoshop does a great job, you can really make a fine tuning for detecting the desired particles you want to remove..). This vibrant, crisp and ultra-vivid 35mm colour negative film offers unsurpassed sharpness and fine grain. Rich tones make any scene come to life - from landscapes or travel to street photography and portraiture. With its high saturation and ultra-fine grain, Ektar 100 is perfect for capturing that elusive creative moment in stunning detail. Features: Though saturated, Ektar’s colours are neither overbearing nor unnatural. The film’s palette is nuanced and is unlikely to be easily replicable by cranking up the “saturation” slider. Our first film guide will cover Kodak, the most storied of the film companies still producing film. Kodak film offerings have thinned out in recent years, but their roster still includes some of the best and more versatile emulsions on the market. Here are our thoughts on the current lineup.When shooting Ektar 100, it’s important to get the most accurate exposure possible. Underexposed shadows look muddy and overexposed highlights look extremely washed out. The first thing to say about Ektar 100 as this review gets wrapped up is that it’s another film I’ve shot and found myself really liking. It’s a film I’ll certainly be shooting again. The downside is that if you underexpose the image, the colors can turn muddy and if you overexpose the image, the colors give off a more pastel and washed out vibe. Muddy colors are difficult to work with, however, if you’re going for a pastel/washed-out look, you can work with overexposing Kodak Ektar 100.



  • Fruugo ID: 258392218-563234582
  • EAN: 764486781913
  • Sold by: Fruugo

Delivery & Returns

Fruugo

Address: UK
All products: Visit Fruugo Shop